Just finishing the introduction, it is very
interesting to notice how the author is able to combine narration with
exposition. Vitier writes in such a way that he tells what Guevara experiences
throughout his trip and at the same time he shows of how he feels it through
vivid and clear examples of his journey. For example, in a narrative section,
he points out, “Their stares are tame, almost fearful, and completely
indifferent to the outside world. Some give the impression they go on living
only because it’s a habit they cannot shake” (p. 24). In this case, Vitier
provides very descriptive examples that show the reader what Guevara is seeing.
This clever combination allows the reader not only to get a precise image of
the situation, but also to get the in-depth description of the situation. The
introduction is written in a way that the reader can not only understand what
the book is going to be about, but get to known how the author is going to
describe the story and which modes of rhetoric he will be manipulating. In
addition, Vitier uses a lot of citations in which he constantly refers to
Guevara’s books. This makes his points much clearer and more credible. It makes
it seem as if Guevara was the one expressing himself in third person. This
technique attracted me and kept me engaged in the introduction.
When the adventure actually begins, it is impressive
to see how the perspective completely changes. During the introduction, Guevara
was presented from a third person point of view, which I thought would make not
such a big difference. However, it does. As soon as the memoir begins, a first
person narrator comes in and takes charge in telling his own story. This
creates a very strong relationship between the audience and the character.
Guevara is able to achieve this through the effective manipulation of pathos.
Throughout the whole first part of the memoir, Guevara is selecting the details
that make the reader realize the great amount of effort and the anxiousness the
two travelers experience. The way in which Guevara is able to get the reader to
sympathize with “Che” right from the beginning is truly amazing. The main
character already has the reputation of a true leader and determined young man
even before he actually begins to achieve his famous accomplishments. This is
exemplifies when Guevara depicts, “The trip was decided just like that, and it
never erred from the basic principle laid down in that moment: improvisation”
(p. 32). By manipulating pathos, Guevara is able to appeal to the audience’s
emotions and make them encourage “Che” to pursuit his dreams and feel pity when
he when describes all the obstacles he has to go through. Will “Che” be able to
get to North America? How do the experiences in his youth affect his viewpoints
later on?
Maybe you could show us how he does this more specifically.
ResponderEliminar